Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs) are promising adsorbents due to their tunable pore structures and surface‐active sites for selective gas adsorption. This study presents the synthesis and characterization of a large‐cage polyhedral zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF‐412) and evaluates its adsorption capacities for CO 2 , N 2 , and CH 4 at different temperatures and pressures. ZIF‐412 exhibits a surface area of 917.76 m 2 /g, with 88% microporosity. The adsorption–desorption and cyclic adsorption tests for CO 2 , N 2 , and CH 4 were conducted at 303 K up to 3000 kPa, demonstrating excellent reversibility and stability. At 273 K and 3000 kPa, the maximum uptakes were 8.1, 2.8, and 4.7 mmol/g, respectively, whereas at 323 K, the corresponding values were 6.0, 1.7, and 3.3 mmol/g for CO 2 , N 2 , and CH 4 , respectively. The gas adsorption enthalpies derived using the Freundlich–Langmuir, virial, and Clausius–Clapeyron models were about −24, −14, and −17 kJ/mol for CO 2 , N 2 , and CH 4 , respectively, indicating an exothermic physisorption process influenced by pore confinement and framework–gas interactions. Additionally, ZIF‐412 exhibited high CO 2 /N 2 selectivity above 20, compared with 3 for CO 2 /CH 4 below 20 kPa at 273–313 K. The trade‐off between adsorption capacity and selectivity highlights its potential for low‐energy CO 2 capture applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vinoba et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: