Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background. Chemoresistance in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains a critical driver of relapse and metastasis. Current explanatory models—EMT reversibility, the absence of upstream CSC drivers, TGF-β pleiotropy, and fragmented RUNX2 functions—exist in isolation, lacking a unified framework. Main body This review proposes the RUNX2-TGF-β positive feedback loop as a working hypothesis for a regulatory node that integrates these mechanisms. In this proposed circuit, TGF-β is postulated to activate RUNX2, which in turn amplifies TGF-β signaling, forming a self-reinforcing loop that is proposed to sustain CSC stemness, plasticity, metabolic adaptation, and drug tolerance. We synthesize the molecular evidence for this circuit, propose a candidate causal chain in chemoresistance, and critically evaluate cross-cancer evidence while distinguishing it from TNBC-specific findings. We then critically analyze why most targeted strategies succeed preclinically yet fail clinically, covering TGF-β inhibitor toxicity, RUNX2 “undruggability,” weak natural compound evidence, and the model-to-clinic gap. Conclusion Given the limited direct causal evidence in TNBC, the RUNX2-TGF-β circuit is presented here as a working hypothesis rather than an established resistance mechanism. We propose a translational validation roadmap and highlight key unresolved questions. Unlike previous reviews, this work explicitly grades the evidence for each link in the circuit and designs a falsifiable experiment to test whether circuit disruption reverses established chemoresistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: