Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The development of bimetallic metal–organic frameworks (BMOFs) represents a promising strategy to meet critical requirements of CO2 capture in flue gas, where CO2 exists at low partial pressure (0.15 bar, 298–333 K) due to the synergistic effects of mixed-metal incorporation that can enhance stability and CO2 affinity. In this study, aluminum and manganese were coordinated on terephthalic acid to produce a series of bimetallic Al-MIL-53-(Mn) with varying Mn/Al molar ratios. These samples were synthesized via a hydrothermal approach, followed by a two-step activation, and characterized using FTIR, PXRD, SEM-EDX, TGA, and the BET method to uncover fundamental CO2 adsorption characteristics. All samples exhibited MIL-53 features, including a predominant microporous structure, the presence of hydroxyl bridging groups in the surface chemistry, a rhomboidal morphology that supports their breathing behavior, and high thermal stability. The textural properties and the crystallinity were enhanced with increased mixed-metal ratios (Mn/Al = 0.15, 0.45, 0.65), and the findings revealed structural destabilization at a high molar ratio (Mn/Al = 0.85). Besides the 77 K low-pressure N2 isotherms, CO2 isotherms measured at a screening temperature of 273 K demonstrated a maximum uptake of 3.03 mmol/g, which compares favorably with the 2.19–2.85 mmol/g reported in the literature for pristine MIL-53(Al). They revealed a consistent Type I Langmuir isotherm with a steep uptake at low partial pressure, which suggests the presence of strong preferential binding sites for CO2 on the surface of bimetallic MOFs. As this is a screening study, the bulk Mn content (ICP-OES), the CO2/N2 selectivity derived from 273 K and 298 K isotherms, the performance at flue-gas temperatures (313–333 K) and moisture tolerance remain to be established.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bulanga et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: