Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study evaluates the accuracy and spatiotemporal generalization of machine-learning estimates of baseline-referenced monthly NDVI anomalies in an alpine study area in Qinghai, China. Pixel-wise reference anomalies were calculated from a 2006 to 2015 monthly climatology, and predictors from 2016 to 2025 included contemporaneous and lagged hydrothermal variables, antecedent NDVI anomalies, and terrain and soil attributes on a common 30 m grid. Target-month NDVI was used to define the observed response, not as a direct model predictor. Five algorithms were assessed using random-split and spatial-block validation, together with a 2025 withheld-year assessment that also informed model selection. Under predefined configurations, gradient boosting decision trees achieved the most favorable overall withheld-year validation performance. A reduced configuration combining month, contemporaneous hydrothermal variables, and lagged NDVI anomalies achieved R 2 = 0.263 and RMSE = 1.145 in 2025, compared with R 2 = 0.254 and RMSE = 1.152 for the full configuration. Lagged NDVI supplied the strongest predictive signal, whereas terrain and soil covariates added little skill. The results characterize same-month anomaly estimation under the evaluated conditions; applications to missing-data reconstruction and management decision-making require separate validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: