Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper examines how community-led solidarity initiatives enable healing in the aftermath of disaster. Drawing on a two-year qualitative study in post-explosion Beirut, it explores how solidarity spaces function as relational structures of repair – sites where material response and affective recovery are not separate processes but mutually constitutive ones. While post-disaster organizing research has emphasized resource mobilization and agility, and disaster studies has identified the importance of community-led recovery, neither has fully explored how organizing enables healing to unfold collectively. Addressing this gap, the study makes two contributions. First, it reframes solidarity spaces as generative holding environments: relational infrastructures that simultaneously contain suffering and enable the emergence of new social arrangements. Second, it conceptualizes healing as organizing: a distributed, collective, and enacted process through which communities transform suffering into agency. Healing, in this account, is not an individual psychological process nor an outcome that follows organizing; it is the very practice through which recovery unfolds, as participants become agents of their own material and affective transformation through acts of solidarity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chaïma Sophia Benzekri (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: