Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BackgroundOutcomes after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) vary beyond lesion burden and clinical severity, suggesting a role for baseline structural brain vulnerability. We evaluated whether brain age gap (BrainAGE) derived from routine non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) is associated with functional outcome after AIS.MethodsWe analyzed 1,173 AIS patients from a prospective multicenter cohort. A deep learning model estimated brain age from contralesional baseline NCCT to minimize lesion-related confounding. BrainAGE was defined as predicted minus chronological age. The primary outcome was 90-day functional status, assessed using proportional odds regression adjusted for age, sex, baseline stroke severity, early ischemic changes, and reperfusion therapy.ResultsBrainAGE was higher in AIS patients than in controls (+3.1 ± 9.1 years; p<0.001). Higher BrainAGE was associated with worse functional outcome after adjustment for age, sex, and other clinical predictors (POR 1.091 per 5 years; 95% CI 1.023-1.162; p=0.008). BrainAGE improved model fit but modestly improved discrimination.ConclusionsBrainAGE from routine NCCT provided modest incremental prognostic information beyond age and conventional clinical predictors. These findings support CT-based BrainAGE as a marker of brain health complementary to established prognostic factors. Whether BrainAGE improves patient-level risk stratification or clinical decision-making requires independent external validation and prospective evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mhajna et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: