Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An additive error in measured galaxy shapes, arising mainly from imperfect correction of the point spread function, contributes a constant offset to shear correlation functions. This paper computes the offset for representative residual amplitudes and compares it with a reference correlation function. A residual of 10 to the minus 3 contributes an additive correlation of 10 to the minus 6, which is 0.46 times the reference xi-plus at 128 arcminutes but a negligible fraction at 8 arcminutes; a residual of 10 to the minus 4 contributes 0.005 at 128 arcminutes. Keeping the additive contribution below ten percent of the signal at 128 arcminutes requires the residual to be below 4.67e-04. Additive systematics therefore set a floor that binds first, and hardest, at the wide separations where large-scale cosmological signatures live. All quantities are computed from stated assumptions, not measured.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: