Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Vehicular networks are increasingly susceptible to RF jamming attacks that compromise communication reliability. This paper proposes four Transformer-based intrusion detection system (IDS) models – BERT, RoBERTa, DistilBERT, and ALBERT – and compares them against three baselines (KNN, RaFo, and LSTM) under vehicular mobility conditions of \(25\) m/s and \(15\) m/s. At \(25\) m/s, BERT and DistilBERT outperform all baselines, while RoBERTa and ALBERT show slightly lower performance. Under the more challenging \(15\) m/s scenario, all Transformer-based models exhibit superior generalization compared to the baselines, which experience significant degradation. The proposed models also maintain higher stability across key metrics—accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Confusion matrix analysis confirms that no RF jamming traffic is misclassified as benign, even under degraded conditions, an essential property for timely threat detection in dynamic vehicular environments. Finally, a computational cost analysis indicates that BERT is better suited for deployment in resource-rich roadside units, while DistilBERT offers the most balanced trade-off for constrained environments, combining low inference time, reduced memory usage, and moderate resource demands. RoBERTa and ALBERT occupy intermediate positions in this spectrum.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wickramasurendra et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: