Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Gallotannins (GTs) are polyphenolic compounds with reported antimicrobial properties, but the relationship between their molecular structure and their activity against Gram-negative bacteria and yeasts remains insufficiently understood. Synthetic analogues of natural GTs provide structurally-defined molecules for the investigation of structure-activity relationships and the identification of compounds with improved or complementary properties. Methods The antibacterial activity of synthetic structural analogues of the natural 1,2,3,4,6-penta- O -galloyl-D-glucose (PGG) and hamamelitannin (HT) was evaluated against Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa , by assessing bacterial growth, cell-surface hydrophobicity, membrane permeability, and biofilm-associated biomass. Their effects in combination with ciprofloxacin or polymyxin B sulphate were also investigated. The antifungal activity was evaluated against a panel of five pathogenic Candida -related yeasts and ten food-spoilage yeast species. Results The differences between the GTs, in terms of efficacy, depended on their chemical structure. PGG and the HT analogue, 2’,5-di- O -galloyl-2- C -(hydroxymethyl)-2,3- O- isopropylidene- d -lyxose (G 2 Lyx), showed the greatest inhibition of E. coli growth, whereas methyl 2,3,4-tri- O -galloyl-α-L-rhamnoside (G 3 Rham) was most active against P. aeruginosa , reducing the growth response by approximately 50% at 8 µg/mL. GTs also altered, to various extents, the bacterial surface hydrophobicity and membrane permeability, depending on the compound and the strain. They did not significantly reduce the biofilm-associated biomass, whereas several analogues, in combination with ciprofloxacin or polymyxin B sulphate, reduced the biomass of P. aeruginosa . PGG and its analogues, methyl 2,3,4,6-tetra- O -galloyl-α-D-glucoside (G 4 Glc), methyl 2,3,4,6-tetra- O -galloyl-α-D-mannoside (G 4 Man), and methyl 2,3,4-tri- O -galloyl-α-L-rhamnoside (G 3 Rham), were most effective against yeasts. Conclusions Synthetic GTs demonstrated distinct, structure- and microorganism-dependent growth-inhibitory effects against Gram-negative bacteria and yeasts. G 3 Rham showed the most pronounced effect against P. aeruginosa , while PGG, G 4 Glc, and G 4 Man were particularly active against several yeast species. The observed changes in bacterial surface properties and the ability to modulate biofilm-associated biomass, in combination with antibiotics, suggest that these compounds may influence microbial responses through multiple mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smułek et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: