Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To assess the carbon footprint of cataract surgery pack-lists entered into the Sustainability Index for Disposables in Cataract Surgery (SIDICS) online platform of the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS), compare real-world configurations with the ESCRS Benchmark Pack, and identify components contributing most to disposable-related emissions. SETTING: International, web-based ESCRS SIDICS platform. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. METHODS: User-entered cataract surgical pack configurations recorded in SIDICS between November 2023 and April 2025 were screened according to inclusion criteria. Carbon emissions were estimated using conservative, material-specific life-cycle assessment data from Ecoinvent v3.7.1 via Ansys Granta EduPack. Pack-level emissions were compared with the ESCRS Benchmark Pack (3.91 kg CO2 equivalent), and product-category contributions were assessed. Submission to SIDICS was voluntary; therefore, the analyzed packs represent a convenience cohort. RESULTS: A total of 609 cataract packs were included. The median carbon footprint was 5.59 kg CO2 equivalent (interquartile range 4.88-6.70 kg). The carbon footprint of 93.3% of submitted packs exceeded that of the ESCRS Benchmark Pack (3.91 kg CO2 equivalent), whereas 6.7% met or fell below it. The median excess over the ESCRS Benchmark Pack was 1.68 kg CO2e (p < 0.001). Drapes and covers accounted for 60.3% of emissions and surgical gowns for 23.7%. CONCLUSION: The carbon footprint of most cataract surgery packs submitted to SIDICS exceeded that of the ESCRS Benchmark Pack, with drapes and gowns accounting for most pack-related emissions. Standardization and selective optimization of these high-impact components may reduce emissions, while still considering patient safety. SIDICS provides a practical tool for benchmarking pack-related emissions and quantifying measurable sustainability improvements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spartalis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: