Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives. The work sets out to develop new approaches to strategic planning methodology in the electronics industry that take into account the current global multi-vector economic transformation and corresponding acceleration of technological changes. The most general framework for the further development of the electronics industry is outlined along with a discussion of its likely impact on the socioeconomic structure of future society. Methods. Along with classical methods for studying socioeconomic relationships pertaining to complex systems such as the electronics industry, systems analysis, foresight technologies, production process modeling, and strategic planning methods are applied. In order to evaluate the explanatory power of different development models, particular attention is given to the multiple comparison method. Results . The study identifies a need for a radical restructuring of economic and industrial sectors in which the electronics industry is accorded a leading role as a result of its development transcending traditional economic rationalizations to acquire a civilizational character. The establishment of the electronics industry as the main driving force for the entire economy, along with a corresponding restructuring of personnel training, thus represents a key strategic element in Russia’s continuing development. Conclusions. In the ongoing race for technological (and therefore economic, military, and political) sovereignty, the creation and continuous development of a strategic planning and management system for the electronics industry acquires a strategic character. The establishment of a genuinely independent national macroeconomic region can be achieved by ensuring self-sufficiency in both the production and consumption of electronic products.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vasily V. Shpak (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: