Key result
Aveir retrieval catheter achieves 100% procedural success for Micra extraction without complications.
Why the study?
Complications such as pacemaker syndrome or device dislodgment occasionally require extraction and replacement of leadless pacemakers. This study aimed to describe the use of the Aveir retrieval sheath during Micra extraction procedures and to assess its success rates and potential complications.
Does the Aveir steerable retrieval catheter safely and effectively extract Micra leadless pacemakers irrespective of dwell time in patients requiring device removal?
Observational (n=14)
Yes
Does the Aveir steerable retrieval catheter safely and effectively extract Micra leadless pacemakers irrespective of dwell time in patients requiring device removal?
This multicenter analysis demonstrates that extracting Micra leadless pacemakers using the Aveir retrieval catheter achieved 100% procedural success without complications, regardless of whether extraction occurred early or late.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports feasibility of leadless pacemaker extraction; leaves open generalizability and safety in larger prospective cohorts.
Background Leadless pacemakers (LP) have emerged as a safe and effective alternative for cardiac pacing, increasingly adopted by the medical community. While rare, complications such as pacemaker syndrome or device dislodgment can occur. In such instances, the extraction of the leadless pacemaker and its replacement with a new device should be considered. Purpose This multicenter study aimed to describe the use of the Aveir retrieval sheath during Micra extraction procedure and to assess the success rates and potential complications associated with the procedure. Methods In this observational study, we analyzed prospectively collected data from 14 patients that underwent leadless pacemaker using Abbott retrieval catheter at three high volume centers for pacemaker extraction and leadless implant in United States. Thought femoral vein the Aveir steerable retrieval catheter is advanced to the right atrium and then across the tricuspid valve. Under TEE and fluoroscopy guidance the snare is advanced over the Micra, and the button is secured. A protective sleeve is advanced over the LP. With application of traction to snare and countertraction with the sleeve against the endocardium, the LP is free from the myocardium and removed via the sheath. (Fig. 1) The procedural duration should be intended as the combined total of the time taken for the extraction of the existing pacemaker and the implantation time of the new device. Extractions performed during the first year were described as early and thereafter as late. Procedural success was described as complete extraction of LP without procedural complication. Results The reason for early explant was LP dislodgment and for late explant was pacemaker syndrome. Median time to extraction was 4±2 months in early explant and 35±9 months in late explant. Procedural time in early and late groups was 68.7 and 72.3 min respectively (P=0.32). Fluoroscopy time in early and late groups was 12.2 and 16.4 respectively (P= 0.18). LP was then replaced with a transvenous pacemaker. Success was 100% in both groups. No complication occurred in both groups. Conclusion Micra pacemaker using Aveir retrieval catheter is an effective tool irrespective of dwell time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fazia et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Leadless pacemaker complications (device dislodgment or pacemaker syndrome) requiring extraction (n=14). Micra leadless pacemaker extraction using the Abbott Aveir steerable retrieval catheter vs. Early explant (<1 year) vs late explant (≥1 year) was evaluated on Procedural success (complete extraction of leadless pacemaker without procedural complication). Micra leadless pacemaker extraction using the Aveir retrieval catheter achieved 100% procedural success with 0% complications in both early and late explant groups.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: