Key result
Bilateral baPWV difference (≥81 vs ≤32 cm/s) was not independently associated with 1-year major cardiovascular events after PCI.
Why the study?
Does the bilateral difference in brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (ΔbaPWV) improve prediction of 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events compared to mean baPWV in patients with normal ankle-brachial indices after percutaneous coronary intervention?
Cohort (n=1,181)
Yes
Does the bilateral difference in brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (ΔbaPWV) improve prediction of 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events compared to mean baPWV in patients with normal ankle-brachial indices after percutaneous coronary intervention?
In patients with normal ankle-brachial indices undergoing PCI, bilateral brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity difference (ΔbaPWV) does not provide robust incremental prognostic value for 1-year MACE and is not recommended for routine clinical risk stratification.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bilateral pulse wave velocity difference should not guide post-stenting risk stratification; leaves open incremental value in larger prospective cohorts.
Bilateral brachial–ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) measurements provide a mean value and an absolute bilateral difference (ΔbaPWV). We compared their associations with 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention. Among 1586 patients in two prospective multicenter stent registries, 1181 had bilateral ankle–brachial indices of 0.90–1.40 and complete baPWV measurements. Greater ΔbaPWV was associated with older age, higher body mass index, higher mean baPWV, and lower ankle–brachial index. During follow-up censored at 400 days, 61 patients experienced MACE, comprising all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any revascularization. Crude incidence increased across ΔbaPWV tertiles (3.3%, 4.6%, and 7.7%; log-rank P = 0.013), but the adjusted highest-versus-lowest tertile comparison was nonsignificant (hazard ratio, 1.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.91–3.56; P = 0.092). Adding raw linear ΔbaPWV, but not mean baPWV, improved clinical-model fit (likelihood-ratio P = 0.026 and P = 0.439). The optimism-corrected C-index gain with ΔbaPWV was 0.007; bootstrap intervals for discrimination differences included zero. The spline association was nonsignificant ( P = 0.133), and continuous estimates were sensitive to extreme-value handling. The two summaries showed different patterns of association in the fitted models, but these findings do not establish robust incremental prognostic value for ΔbaPWV and do not support its routine use for risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cho et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (n=1,181). Highest tertile of bilateral brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity difference (ΔbaPWV ≥81 cm/s) vs. Lowest tertile of bilateral brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity difference (ΔbaPWV ≤32 cm/s) was evaluated on 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any revascularization) (HR 1.80, 95% CI 0.91-3.56, p=0.092). Bilateral baPWV difference (≥81 vs ≤32 cm/s) was not independently associated with 1-year major cardiovascular events after PCI.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: