Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: Full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD) has been suggested as a potentially advantageous substitute for the surgical therapy of re-herniated lumber discs. This prospective study aimed to determine the clinical outcomes of full endoscopic lumber spine surgery in re-current disc herniation. Material and Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted over 2 years, from May 2020 to May 2022 with a year follow-up period. The study included patients who presented to the outpatient department with lumbar disc re-herniation that was confirmed to be symptomatic by conducting clinical evaluation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and/or computed tomography (CT) scans. Depending on the location and size of the disc herniation, either an interlaminar or transforaminal route was used during full endoscopic lumbar spine surgery. Results: 442 lumbar disc surgeries were carried out in total over the 2-year research period. Of these procedures, 87 cases were reherniation surgeries, which made up about 19.6% of all lumbar disc surgeries. The majority of patients (80% in transforaminal and 75% in interlaminar) had incisions less than 8mm in length. Less than 5% of cases in both method groups experienced complications during the procedures, most of which were mild dural tears and bleeding. Conclusion: This study concluded that recurring lumbar disc herniations can be safely treated with full endoscopic lumber spine surgery with good intra and post-operative outcomes while minimizing further structural damage compared to open interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farooq et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: