Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: Inhibitory control and working memory comprise core executive functions which have been implicated in hazardous alcohol consumption. Yet, there is a dearth of research examining whether daily fluctuations in these cognitive domains predict alcohol use. The current study implemented an ecological momentary assessment design to determine whether day-to-day changes in inhibitory control and working memory predict the likelihood and quantity of alcohol consumption. METHOD: = 21.48 years; female = 73 %) were prompted daily to complete Stop-Signal and n-Back tasks via the CheckCog app over 14 days. Participants also recorded their alcohol consumption using the Alcohol Capture app. RESULTS: Generalised linear mixed modelling demonstrated a significant effect of working memory on daily consumption (IRR = 0.72, 95 % CI 0.54, 0.97), with greater accuracy predicting a reduced number of standard drinks consumed. No effect of inhibitory control on daily consumption was found (IRR = 0.98, 95 % CI 0.64, 1.50). Neither inhibitory control nor working memory were found to predict the likelihood of drinking. Exploratory analyses conducted on a sub-sample of participants indicated significant effects of within-day change in inhibitory control (IRR = 2.19, 95 % CI 1.07, 4.50) and working memory (IRR = 0.56, 95 % CI 0.32, 0.96) on consumption, such that deterioration in performance predicted greater consumption. CONCLUSIONS: These results support further examination of cognitive markers as real-time predictors of alcohol use which may inform the development of just-in-time interventions targeting hazardous drinking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dali et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: