Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose To develop an interpretable machine learning (ML) framework integrating CT radiomics from dose-specific lung regions with dosimetric parameters to accurately predict radiation pneumonitis (RP) in breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Methods This dual-institute retrospective study included 94 breast cancer patients. Four dose-volume-specific regions of interest (DVROI5, DVROI20, DVROI30, DVROI5–20) were defined on planning CT. A total of 107 radiomic features per DVROI were extracted alongside clinical and dosimetric variables. After feature selection (correlation filtering + Boruta), 11 ML models were trained (70% data, 5-fold cross-validation) and tested on 30% of data. SHAP analysis provided model interpretability. Results RP occurred in 36 patients (38.3%). Boruta selected only radiomic and dosimetric features (2–3 each per DVROI), excluding clinical covariates. XGBoost performed best for DVROI5 (test AUC=0.876), DVROI20 (AUC=0.750), and DVROI5–20 (AUC=0.821), while GBM excelled for DVROI30 (AUC=0.818). The optimal XGBoost model (DVROI5) achieved accuracy 0.852, precision 0.8, recall 0.8, and F1-score 0.8. SHAP identified V5, GLCM cluster prominence, surface-volume ratio, MLD, and V20 as top predictors. Conclusion An explainable XGBoost model combining DVROI5 radiomic features with dosimetric parameters predicted RP with high accuracy (AUC=0.876), outperforming traditional dosimetric thresholds. SHAP-enhanced interpretability supports clinical transparency and personalized risk mitigation. Multi-center prospective validation is needed before widespread adoption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: