Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To address the high experimental cost, insufficient parameter-space coverage, and multi-objective trade-off difficulties in milling parameter optimization under small-sample conditions, this study proposes a digital twin-driven multi-objective optimization method for milling parameters. An end-milling process is considered, with spindle speed, feed rate, axial depth of cut, and radial depth of cut selected as input parameters. A unified virtual evaluation interface is constructed to rapidly evaluate machining time, cutting force, and the probability of satisfying surface quality constraints. To improve parameter-space coverage, a diffusion-inspired noise-perturbation augmentation method is used to generate supplementary samples, which are further filtered using parameter bounds and cutting-force physical consistency constraints. A Gaussian process regression model is then established as a surface roughness threshold classification model, transforming surface quality evaluation into a probabilistic constraint satisfaction problem. Based on the virtual evaluation model, Bayesian optimization and a multi-objective genetic algorithm are combined to search for Pareto non-dominated solutions. The case study shows that the proposed method can generate a relatively continuous set of trade-off solutions among machining time, cutting force, and surface quality feasibility, providing alternative parameter combinations for different machining preferences. The optimization results are further integrated into a digital twin visualization system for interactive comparison and decision support. The recommended parameter combinations still require further validation through physical machining experiments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: