Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Manual aerobics scoring is sensitive to evaluator experience, while a single sensing modality cannot fully represent posture, dynamics, and musical timing. This study develops an intelligent evaluation model that encodes video, skeleton, inertial, and music-rhythm data in parallel and integrates them through cross-modal attention, reliability-aware fusion, temporal attention, and multi-task scoring. The dataset contains 8,466 valid sequences from 60 adult athletes. On a participant-independent test set, the model achieved an MAE of 3.18 points, R 2 of 0.946, and macro-F1 of 0.925 for four-class primary deviation recognition. Performance declined under cross-site and cross-device testing, with MAE increasing to 4.28 and 4.47 points, respectively. A four-week pilot involving 18 athletes and four teachers indicated shorter video-review time, but it was not designed to establish long-term technical improvement or deployment readiness. The model therefore provides an auxiliary source of quantitative evidence for training diagnosis rather than a substitute for expert judgment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xue et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: