Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reconciling carbon sequestration with sustained crop productivity remains a central challenge in biochar-based soil management. Carbon-stabilizing practices often intensify microbial nutrient immobilization and microbe–crop competition. Whether biochar can realign microbial carbon–nitrogen accessibility to resolve this trade-off remains unclear. We conducted a three-year field experiment under a maize-wheat-rapeseed rotation to test whether a one-time co-composted biochar–manure application reshapes microbial resource accessibility and optimizes nutrient pathways regulating crop productivity. Five treatments were compared: control (CK), biochar (B), manure (M), biochar plus manure (M+B), and co-composted biochar–manure (M+AB). Soil physicochemical properties, potential microbial substrate-utilization response (hereinafter referred to as sum of C and N substrate-induced respiration: ΣIR_C and ΣIR_N), carbon and nitrogen accessibility indices (CAI and NAI), microbial abundance, enzyme activities in 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soil layers, and cumulative crop yield were evaluated. Compared with CK, M + AB increased soil organic carbon by 17% and improved aggregate stability relative to biochar alone. M stimulated respiration and nutrient utilization, whereas B moderated microbial activity but provided limited yield benefits. In contrast, M + AB balanced ΣIR_C and ΣIR_N responses, reduced nutrient utilization in surface soil, and enhanced nitrifier abundance in deeper soil by (115%), over M+B. CAI and NAI remained tightly coupled (R² = 0.89, P < 0.001), indicating coordinated microbial regulation of resource acquisition under M + AB, whereby CAI strongly predicted crop yield (R² up to 0.95), whereas NAI showed no independent direct relationship. Crucially, by increasing SOC while suppressing excessive microbial activity, the M + AB treatment resolved the carbon–productivity trade-off and achieved the highest cumulative yield (19%) across maize-wheat-rapeseed rotations. This was supported by PLS-PM which showed manure-driven microbial substrate-utilization response in surface soil directly constrained yield, while co-composting weakened this constraint and improved nutrient accessibility, resulting in the highest cumulative crop yield. These findings demonstrate that M + AB reshapes microbial resource accessibility rather than simply supplying nutrients, enabling sustained productivity from a single application. Managing carbon accessibility and microbial substrate-utilization response regulation is therefore critical for synchronizing soil carbon sequestration with crop productivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mustafa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: