Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The selective separation of lithium and cobalt from leachate solution is a critical challenge in lithium-ion battery (LIB) waste management. This study develops a detailed process simulation and techno-economic assessment (TEA) of a hydrometallurgical recycling process to recover lithium and cobalt from lithium cobalt oxide (LCO) cathode materials using sulfuric acid-based leaching. The process was simulated in Aspen Plus® V14, incorporating stoichiometric reaction blocks with electrolyte-equilibrium chemistry to accurately model metal dissolution, aqueous speciation, separation, and precipitation. The simulation results in 99.89 % cobalt sulfate (CoSO 4 ) purity and 98.93 % lithium carbonate (Li 2 CO 3 ) purity, respectively. An economic analysis, considering both capital and operating costs, resulted in a positive net present value (NPV) of $36.72 million over a 20-year project duration for a 100 kg/hr feed. This suggests economic potential under the base-case performance scenario. Sensitivity analysis showed that profitability is highly sensitive to both product price realization and recovery efficiency. This study serves as a foundation for future process optimization and comparative evaluation of new recycling technologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amusa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: