Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Threshold-based tax incentives are common, but conditioning eligibility on a threshold can induce firms to bunch below it, raising the concern that such incentives keep firms small. Using matched administrative tax and business registration data from China, with a baseline sample over 2009–2016 and firm survival tracked through 2019, we study a preferential corporate income tax policy for small service firms and ask whether bunching merely reflects short-run adjustment or also shapes subsequent growth. We document significant bunching below the taxable-income thresholds. In the bunching year, firms in the bunching region report net profit margins 0.09–0.16% points lower than the counterfactual without bunching, together with lower reported operating revenue and higher reported deductible costs, especially labour-related expenses. In subsequent years, however, the same firms display higher productivity, larger scale, and lower exit risk. These findings suggest that short-run strategic adjustment around tax thresholds need not translate into persistent size suppression. More broadly, the consequences of threshold-based incentives depend not only on where the threshold is set, but also on how the tax base is defined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: