Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Self-service business intelligence moves report building to thousands of staff, and the support load moves with it: questions about access, refresh failures, DAX and permissions become tickets for a far smaller BI team. This article reports the design, deployment and outcomes of a large language model (LLM) support agent for the City of San José's Power BI platform (3,000+ users, 100+ production dashboards). Piloted as a custom GPT and rebuilt in Microsoft Copilot Studio, grounded in curated City content and connected to Teams and the IT service-management system, the agent is described through a four-layer architecture, a weekly routine that turns closed tickets into cited answers, and the governance controls a public agency required. A twelve-month interrupted time series shows median monthly Power BI tickets falling 45% (191 to 104) and 49% per 1,000 active users, a level change at release of −60 tickets a month (95% CI −84 to −35, p < 0.001) with no pre-release trend, while the agent handled 316 sessions a month with cited answers in under a minute. Controls are mapped to the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, a quality-and-effort protocol is specified, and the findings argue that content currency, not prompt design, is the operating cost of such an agent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vamshi Vanguri (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: