Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A fundamental component of Brain–Computer Interface (BCI) systems is Motor imagery (MI)-based electroencephalogram (EEG) signal categorization. However, inter-subject variability and high dimensionality frequently restrict its performance. This paper proposes a thorough machine learning (ML) framework for categorization using a recently collected dataset that hasn’t been thoroughly examined in previous research. In order to improve MI-EEG signal recognition, this paper introduces a hybrid ML approach that combines feature standardization, dimensionality reduction using Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and multi-model classification. To improve discriminative power and cut down on redundancy, the collected features are first normalized and condensed to a compact representation using PCA. A stratified train–test split is then used to train and assess several supervised learning algorithms, including Naïve Bayes (NB), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Gradient Boosting (GB), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). According to experimental data, NB performs the lowest (52.70%), whereas Logistic Regression has the best average classification accuracy of 85.91%, followed by SVM (79.16%) and RF (77.68%). Ensemble and boosting techniques like LightGBM (75.37%), and XGBoost (75.06%) yield competitive results, demonstrating their subject-matter resilience. The results show that PCA greatly improves classification efficiency without sacrificing high accuracy. All things considered, the suggested architecture provides a dependable and scalable MI-EEG classification solution and has potential for BCI applications in real time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Velakanti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: