Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Vehicle-to-grid operation in commercial fleets remains debated due to interoperability limits, user acceptance, warranty concerns, and regulatory uncertainty. This paper reports a five-week multi-site pilot demonstration in mainland Portugal evaluating a centralized coordination architecture that uses V2G and low-complexity rule-based control to capture behind-the-meter value: energy arbitrage under time-of-use tariffs, peak-load shaving, and photovoltaic surplus self-consumption, relying only on site telemetry, charging-session data, and conservative state-of-charge (SoC) limits agreed with fleet users. Across three sites, 374 kWh of charging was shifted from peak to off-peak periods, 150 kWh was discharged during peak periods, and 16.6 kWh of additional charging was enabled from solar surplus. These actions resulted in €20 of EV charging cost savings (a 26% cost-weighted reduction against the rebased baseline), €7.9 of site-level energy savings, and an estimated €39.4 reduction in demand-related charges, modest and highly site-specific values. Average departure SoC decreased from 96% to 79% but remained above the agreed 50% minimum throughout the pilot. Beyond these outcomes, the study draws deployment lessons on measurement uncertainty, control-interval limits, plug-in behavior, battery-condition observability, protocol maturity, deployment cost, and regulatory constraints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Egunjobi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: