Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Optimizing radiographic use in children is essential to balance diagnostic benefit against radiation risk. This audit evaluated imaging utilization, cumulative exposure, and adherence to justification principles among CBCT-referred children and adolescents. Methods: A retrospective audit was conducted within Dubai Health, including 149 children aged 5–17 years identified through CBCT examinations performed during a one-year retrieval period (January–December 2025), whose complete historical dental imaging records were reviewed. Data included modality, frequency, inter-examination intervals, cumulative exposure, radiation dose metrics, and clinical justification. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results: A total of 839 examinations were analyzed across five examinations. OPG was most frequent (n = 231), followed by BW (n = 200), IOPA (n = 167), CBCT (n = 158), and CEPHALO (n = 83). IOPA demonstrated the highest frequency and variability, including repeated short-interval imaging, whereas CBCT and CEPHALO were infrequent and rarely repeated. A clear dose hierarchy was observed (CBCT >> OPG > CEPHALO), with CBCT showing greater variability. Justification rates were high, particularly for CBCT and BW (100%), while OPG was lower (88.3%). A small subset exhibited higher cumulative imaging (up to ~19 examinations), increasing with age. Conclusions: Among CBCT-referred children and adolescents, imaging practices demonstrated strong adherence to indication-based use. These findings should be interpreted within the context of a CBCT-referred cohort and may not be generalizable to all pediatric dental patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saidian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: