Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study investigated the performance of the 9-item EQ Health and Wellbeing instrument (EQ-HWB-9) in measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) and broader aspects of health among older adults across five English-speaking countries. Data from the EuroQol Data for Assessment of Population Health Needs and Instrument Evaluation (EQ-DAPHNIE) project in Canada, United States of America (USA), United Kingdom (UK), Australia, and New Zealand were analyzed. Descriptive analyses were conducted by country; distributional properties of the measure including floor/ceiling effects were examined; instrument performance was evaluated by assessing convergent and discriminative validity. The UK experimental value set was used to calculate an EQ-HWB-9 index score for all countries. The performance of the EQ-HWB-9 was also compared with that of the EQ-5D-5L in these populations. A total of 5,274 respondents aged 65 years or older (Canada, n = 1278; USA, n = 1042; UK, n = 953; Australia, n = 1204; and New Zealand, n = 797) were included. The mean EQ-HWB-9 index scores ranged from 0.81 (SD 0.19) in Canada to 0.85 (SD 0.18) in New Zealand. No substantial floor effects were observed, and only the UK showed a near-threshold ceiling effect. Spearman correlations indicated that the EQ-HWB-9 supported expected patterns of convergent validity. Known-group comparisons showed that EQ-HWB-9 effectively distinguished between individuals based on having a chronic condition across 15 conditions, as well as between groups defined by different health states according to other measures. The EQ-HWB-9 performed well in capturing different aspects of HRQL among older adults across five countries, and can provide added value in assessing psychosocial aspects of health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: