Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Urban digitalization requires site-specific evidence to determine where intelligent sensing, edge processing, warning actuation and energy management functions are justified. This repeated cross-sectional field study quantified changes in smartphone-related behaviour and electrified micromobility at an unsignalized roundabout in Kielce, Poland, and translated them into technical requirements and an energy budget for a privacy-preserving, energy-aware crossing infrastructure. Two observers recorded 27,487 crossing-area users in 1728 arm-specific five-minute intervals during 18 standardized two-hour sessions in 2023–2025. Any phone use increased from 41.87% to 48.63% (difference 6.76 percentage points, 95% CI 5.31–8.20; Cohen’s h = 0.14), and a combined electric micromobility exposure indicator increased from 11.84% to 22.39% (h = 0.28), while bicycle prevalence remained near 8%. The phone-use trend was robust to the clustering of observations: session-clustered logistic regression, a random-intercept model and an exact stratified permutation test using the 18 sessions as independent units (p < 0.001) gave consistent results, and a composition analysis showed that the trend was not explained by the growing share of micromobility users. The effects are small in standardized terms but correspond to approximately 120 additional phone-engaged users per hour at peak volumes. The framework specifies homography-based trajectory prediction, time-to-collision conflict detection, a logistic risk score with data-driven threshold selection, k-anonymous aggregate data release and a staged validation plan with key performance indicators. A field-calibrated, state-based energy budget estimated 0.63–0.73 kWh/day for event-based operation of a four-approach edge node, 28–42% less than presence-activated and 60–65% less than continuously active operation. Transport-energy savings cannot be inferred because trip distances and displaced modes were not observed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frej et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: