Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a leading cause of preventable childhood blindness. Although the North-American (NA)/American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) and Growth and ROP (G-ROP) criteria are highly sensitive, they may trigger unnecessary examinations. This study evaluated whether an interpretable machine-learning (ML) model could reduce screen-positive classifications while identifying all documented Early Treatment for ROP (ETROP) type 1 ROP cases. Methods: A retrospective study included infants admitted to Hadassah Medical Center neonatal intensive care units (January 2023-February 2025). Of 2159 infants, 387 met local screening criteria (gestational age ≤32 weeks or birth weight ≤1500 g); 189 had complete G-ROP predictor data, and 5 were excluded because ROP status remained unavailable. ML models used gestational age, birth weight, and postnatal weight gain. L1-regularized logistic regression models used either gestational age and birth weight alone or these variables plus G-ROP postnatal weight-gain measures. Leave-one-out cross-validation assessed performance. Results: Among 184 infants, 21 had type 1 ROP; all approaches identified all 21 cases. Local, NA/AAO, modified G-ROP, and birth-based criteria classified 184 (100.0%), 174 (94.6%), 137 (74.5%), and 94 (51.1%) infants as screen-positive, respectively. The 5-variable ML model classified 58 (31.5%; specificity = 77.3%) as screen-positive, a 68.5% reduction versus local screening and 57.7% versus G-ROP (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] = 0.914). The birth-only ML model performed similarly (55/184 [29.9%]; specificity = 79.1%; AUROC = 0.909), indicating no incremental screening benefit from postnatal weight gain. Conclusions: Interpretable ML substantially reduced screen-positive classifications while identifying all documented type 1 ROP cases. Similar birth-only performance supports prospective validation of locally adapted screening. Translational Relevance: Routinely collected data and ML framework may enable more efficient type 1 ROP screening and neonatal ophthalmic care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ben‐Eli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: