Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction Lung cancer brain metastasis is shaped by reciprocal interactions between tumor cells and the brain microenvironment, yet whether KDM1A/LSD1 influences this communication through tumor-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) remains unclear. Methods Here, we combined within-patient single-cell transcriptomic analysis with genetic and pharmacological LSD1 perturbation, EV-based functional assays, and an intracranial xenograft model to define an LSD1-associated tumor-myeloid communication phenotype. Results Single-cell analysis identified a reproducible KDM1A co-expression-associated tumor-cell state characterized by coordinated communication- and microenvironment-remodeling programs and recurrent APP-CD74- and MDK-related signaling patterns. Among the prioritized candidates, MDK showed the most consistent experimental response to LSD1 knockout, with concordant reductions in donor-cell mRNA, cellular protein and EV-associated protein. Functionally, EVs derived from LSD1-deficient tumor cells shifted HMC3 microglia-like cells toward a mixed inflammatory and immunoregulatory state and altered their secretory output. Conditioned medium from these EV-exposed HMC3 cells subsequently suppressed H1299 proliferation and enhanced apoptosis, indicating a secondary tumor-myeloid-tumor paracrine effect. Pharmacological LSD1 inhibition produced a partially overlapping functional phenotype. In mice with established intracranial tumors, LSD1-KO-EV treatment was associated with lower endpoint ex vivo brain bioluminescence, with representative H&E sections showing a qualitatively concordant pattern. Discussion These findings support EV-mediated tumor-myeloid communication as one consequence of LSD1 perturbation and nominate MDK-associated EV remodeling for direct mechanistic testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: