Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Structural assessment of customized 3D-printed prosthetic sockets requires a basis for selecting geometries and loading relevant socket regions. This study explored a population-informed assessment framework combining statistical shape sampling with mock limb material comparisons. A statistical shape model (SSM) was reconstructed from 67 archived records of liner-covered residual limbs. Geometries at the empirical 2.5th, 50th, and 97.5th percentiles of the first principal component guided socket design; mock limbs matched the socket inner surfaces. Nine finite element cases compared aluminum, a muscle-inspired surrogate, and a bulk soft-tissue surrogate under 4480 N loading based on ISO 10328 condition I at level P5. At the 2.5th, 50th, and 97.5th percentiles, trimline maxima were 1.0, 1.5, and 0.7 MPa for aluminum; 16.0, 12.4, and 3.9 MPa for the muscle-inspired surrogate; and 19.7, 14.1, and 3.9 MPa for the bulk surrogate. Whole-socket peaks shifted from the distal attachment with aluminum to the anterior trimline with compliant surrogates in two geometries; all materials produced distal peaks in the 97.5th-percentile geometry. These findings support combining patient-derived shape sampling with explicit mock limb specification for regional socket assessment. Shape percentiles describe observed variation rather than worst-case strength conditions. The framework may inform complementary test configurations, but failure prediction and product assurance require broader assessment and physical validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: