Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose This study aims to investigate the strategic futures of business-to-business (B2B) marketing by identifying the interlinked themes shaping its transformation, with particular attention to artificial intelligence (AI) as a cross-cutting force embedded in sociotechnical and institutional developments. Design/methodology/approach A two-round Delphi study with 29C-level industry experts was conducted. Responses were coded into 192 thematic mentions across 16 themes, analyzed through co-occurrence mapping and classified in a dual-axis typology by perceived nature (opportunity vs challenge) and origin (sociotechnical vs institutional). Findings AI is central but rarely operates in isolation: it co-occurs with every other theme, functioning as the connective node between internal capabilities and external demands in interorganizational relationships. The typology reveals a statistically significant attribution asymmetry (χ2(1) = 40.23, p < 0.001): internally buildable themes are framed as opportunities, externally imposed demands as challenges. Originality/value The paper theorizes AI not as a tool within the firm but as a boundary-spanning coordination mechanism coupling sociotechnical and institutional domains. The dual-axis typology, tested attribution asymmetry and three propositions provide a foresight-driven framework for understanding strategic readiness in B2B transformation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hornig et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: