Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Residual maize roots alter soil adhesion and tillage resistance in wet loessal soil. A zoned, coupled biomimetic plough surface was developed by combining a shark shield-scale-inspired serrated structure (SSS) on the ploughshare with an antlion-inspired spherical convex hull structure (SCH) on the mouldboard. A coupled soil–root–plough DEM model incorporated Hertz–Mindlin with JKR and bonding contact models and a flexible root model. A Box–Behnken design optimized SCH height, lateral spacing, and longitudinal spacing using soil adhesion mass and tillage resistance as responses. Both regression models were highly significant (p < 0.0001), with R2 values of 0.9873 and 0.9861, respectively. The selected dimensions were 14, 17, and 14 mm. In the DEM surface-configuration comparison, the coupled structure reduced simulated adhesion mass by 69.30% relative to the smooth baseline, with the SCH providing the dominant anti-adhesion contribution. In a separate simulated root-condition comparison, the biomimetic surface reduced adhesion mass by 49.89% in root-free soil and 56.96% in root-containing soil relative to the corresponding smooth-surface treatments. For the same surface configuration, root inclusion reduced adhesion but increased tillage resistance. The optimized design increased the simulated soil-disturbance cross-sectional area by 5.3% and the number of broken interparticle bonds from 5.32 × 105 to 6.03 × 105. Soil-bin experiments at a soil water content of 16 ± 1% and a tillage depth of 250 mm measured reductions of 59.80% in adhesion mass and 12.20% in mean tillage resistance relative to the smooth surface.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Du et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: