Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Previous Biorefinery Unit Block (BUB) work assessed the circular-economy concept at city scale. This Part I reformulates it as a physically consistent, replicable BUB (four digesters, 21,600 m3 effective volume, 6480 t of municipal organic matter per month) and scales it to ten South American countries under a uniform recoverable municipal-organic-matter coefficient and national pooling assumption, with the combined heat and power engine assigned by grid frequency. Economics combine an energy-only ledger with conditional screening of liquid-digestate (biol) valorization. For 435.734 million inhabitants, the model requires 729.07 equivalent and 734 physical BUBs (99.33% utilization), giving technical potentials of 56.69 Mt/yr of organic matter, 4.535 × 109 Nm3/yr of biogas, 9.489 TWh/yr of net electricity and 221.3 Mm3/yr of biol, with screening process-plant capital expenditure of USD 3.844 billion. The energy-only break-even is 75.29–78.48 USD/MWh at national utilization; 11 of the 13 country–price scenarios lie below it. Under a common Peru-reference marker, the required product of biol-use and value-capture fractions falls below 0.9 in several tested combinations when application and haul costs are low, and potassium credit is high. These are conditional thresholds, not evidence of viability: fractions are not empirically assigned, and country-specific costs are excluded.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Montoya et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: