Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rapid pesticide screening is limited by low-dimensional optical readouts that may not preserve sufficient information to distinguish structurally diverse residues and estimate their concentrations. Here, three poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP)-modulated MOF-199 copper nanozymes were combined with laccase-like, peroxidase-like, and superoxide dismutase-like chromogenic reactions to construct a 3 × 3 cross-reactive material-reaction sensor array. Quantitative XPS and N2 sorption revealed PVP-dependent differences in surface composition, external surface area, and pore volume. Across eight pesticides and twelve concentrations from 0.1 to 100 μg mL-1, full UV-vis spectra from 400 to 700 nm were assembled into 9 × 301 matrices. A multitask one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) decoded these matrices to jointly perform pesticide classification and concentration regression, achieving 94.4% accuracy, macro-F1 = 94.4%, R2 = 0.894, and RMSE = 10.46 μg mL-1 in standard-solution tests. Spectral-window ablation showed improved prediction with broader wavelength coverage, while an endpoint comparison further supported the advantage of the full spectral representation. Input-gradient and Grad-CAM analyses mapped model reliance to material-reaction channels and chromogenic wavelength regions, supporting interpretable identity-concentration decoding. In apple, cucumber, and pepper matrices, the trained nine-class classifier assigned representative pesticides and blank controls with 97.2% overall accuracy. These results demonstrate that wavelength-resolved catalytic fingerprints support interpretable classification and concentration estimation of single-pesticide samples in standard solutions and retain class-discriminating information in the tested produce matrices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: