Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: As the 24-h economy expands, an increasing share of the global workforce engages in nighttime work. Most previous studies have documented adverse effects among healthcare workers and in high-income countries. Evidence in low-income earners in low- and middle-income countries is limited. This study analyzed the association between night shift work and the diets of convenience store workers in Bangkok, Thailand, focusing on fruit and vegetable intake. Methods: The study used a within-person repeated-measures design with questionnaires administered to 100 convenience store workers in Bangkok during their regular daytime and nighttime shifts. The Diet Quality Questionnaire (DQQ) was used and relied on self-reported food intake over the past 24 h. Data were analyzed using a paired t-test and panel regression. Predictors included food sources and personal domains of the food environment. Results: Mean fruit and vegetable intake was 198 g per day, half the amount recommended by the World Health Organization. There was no statistically significant difference in combined fruit and vegetable intake between days with a day shift and days with a night shift for both the panel logistic regression (p = 0.184) and the paired t-test analysis (p = 0.156). However, diet diversity (MD = 0.40, SEMD = 0.16, p < 0.05) and the non-communicable disease (NCD)-Protect score (MD = 0.61, SEMD = 0.17, p < 0.01) statistically differed across shifts. Night shifts were associated with lower diet diversity (B = −0.41, p < 0.01) and reduced NCD-Protect (B = −0.63, p < 0.001). The number of convenience store visits was significantly associated with NCD-Protect (B = −0.45, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Night shift workers generally have low fruit and vegetable intake. Night shift work is negatively associated with dietary diversity and intake of protective foods. There is a need for employer and policy measures to protect shift workers’ health regardless of work hours.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suvanbenjakule et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: