Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Population-scale plasma proteomics has begun to map the circulating proteome across human diseases, yet reducing these large datasets to interpretable compact protein panels that remain accurate across independent cohorts is a major challenge. Here, we developed a network-guided framework that links the Human Disease Blood Atlas (HDBA) to the UK Biobank Pharma Proteomics Project (UKB-PPP) through 1154 proteins quantified in both cohorts and evaluates protein signatures across 23 human diseases. For each disease, we considered two classification tasks: disease versus healthy and disease versus diseases. Compact protein panels achieved a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.741 and 0.736 for the two tasks, compared with 0.827 and 0.797 for a baseline model comprising all shared proteins, and outperformed this baseline in 7 of 23 diseases per task. Integrating panel membership with differential protein levels and disease-associated co-expression modules reveals disease-enriched candidates from disease-shared proteins associated with multiple conditions. This framework provides a structured, systems-level basis for prioritizing plasma protein signatures across diverse diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: