Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Accurate preoperative assessment of axillary lymph node (ALN) metastatic burden is crucial for guiding individualized axillary management in breast cancer, particularly for node-positive patients. This study aimed to develop and validate a combined clinical, radiomics, and deep learning (DL) feature–based model using preoperative ultrasound (US) for non-invasive prediction of ALN metastatic burden (low <3 vs. high ≥3 positive nodes). This retrospective study included 322 breast cancer patients with ALN metastasis confirmed by ALND pathology. Patients were categorized into low- and high-burden groups and randomly split into training (n=225) and test (n=97) sets. Clinical, radiomics, and DL features were extracted from intratumoral regions, combined intratumoral and peritumoral (1–3 mm) regions, and whole US images. Machine learning algorithms were used to build clinical, radiomics, DL, and combined models, which were evaluated using AUC, sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Clinical models showed limited performance in predicting ALN metastatic burden. Radiomics and DL models demonstrated improved performance, with further gains after incorporating peritumoral information. The combined model showed superior performance: a random forest-based model integrating clinical data, intratumoral and 3-mm peritumoral radiomics features, and ResNet50-derived DL features achieved the highest test-set AUC (0.855), with SEN/SPE/PPV/NPV of 0.875/0.867/0.854/0.811, respectively. An ultrasound-based model that integrates clinical, radiomics, and DL features—especially those from both intratumoral and peritumoral regions—can effectively and non-invasively predict ALN metastatic burden in breast cancer patients. This approach may serve as a valuable preoperative decision-support tool for identifying patients at high risk of nodal burden and supporting individualized axillary management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: