Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Speech-language pathologists are required to deliver services across multiple languages and cultures. This is particularly true for multicultural South Africa. Although the country does have speech-language pathology guidelines to support its culturally and linguistically diverse context, a framework for developing new guidelines (or updating them) has yet to be published. To fill said gap, this paper presents an eight-phase process as a methodological framework for developing clinical practice guidelines, following the core principles of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline development framework, drawing on the authors’ experience developing a new guideline document, and using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II). A sequential mixed-methods design was employed, drawing on methodologies from four published papers: a scoping review, two hermeneutical studies, and a stakeholder review. The phases are to identify the topic, need, purpose and target audience and population of the guidelines; select the development group; collect and review evidence; grade the evidence; formulate the guidelines; conduct external appraisal; disseminate, peer-review and implement the guidelines; and update them. The framework provides a roadmap for developing culturally responsive guidelines. Evidence suggests that the framework can be effectively applied to develop high-quality guidelines. Moreover, it can serve as a training tool for undergraduate and postgraduate studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Botha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: