Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Porous SiC f /SiC composites were modified by epoxy resin infiltration (SiC f /SiC‐EP) and phenolic resin infiltration followed by pyrolysis (SiC f /SiC‐PyC). Their physical properties, thermal degradation behavior, microstructure, and flexural performance were investigated after oxidation at 300–700°C. The untreated SiC f /SiC‐EP composite exhibited a flexural strength of 1013.07 MPa, which decreased to 657.15 MPa at 400°C and 182.23 MPa at 700°C. This deterioration was associated with epoxy degradation, increased pore connectivity, and reduced matrix continuity. In contrast, SiC f /SiC‐PyC exhibited a nonmonotonic response, with strength decreasing from 440.42 MPa to 165.90 MPa at 400°C, recovering to 395.27 MPa at 500°C, and declining to 138.55 MPa at 700°C. The temporary recovery coincided with increased fiber pull‐out and a more tortuous fracture morphology, suggesting changes in crack–interface interactions. Localized carbon oxidation and residual‐stress relaxation may contribute, although their roles remain unverified. TG–DTG analysis revealed mass losses of approximately 12% and 5% for SiC f /SiC‐EP and SiC f /SiC‐PyC composites, respectively, while XRD detected no new crystalline phases. These findings link mechanical degradation to pore and interfacial evolution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: