Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective To characterize time-dependent lower-limb asymmetry between the dominant and non-dominant limbs during single-leg lateral jump landing and determine whether discrete peak metrics overlook phase-specific differences. Methods Twenty-nine healthy young men performed single-leg lateral jump landings on both limbs while three-dimensional kinematics and ground reaction forces (GRF) were recorded. The landing deceleration phase was analyzed using discrete peak comparisons, one-dimensional statistical parametric mapping (SPM1D), and a normalized symmetry index based on continuous waveforms (SI_norm). SI_norm thresholds of ±10% and ±20% were used to characterize the direction and duration of individual-level asymmetry. Results Discrete peak analysis showed that the maximum hip joint angle was greater in the dominant limb than in the non-dominant limb, with a paired mean difference of 12.04° (95% CI 7.23°–16.84°, Holm-adjusted p < 0.001, Cohen’s d_z = 0.953). In contrast, SPM1D analysis showed that the dominant limb exhibited significantly greater ankle joint angles during 9.6%–26.5% of the landing deceleration phase (cluster-level p = 0.0052, corrected p = 0.0362), and significantly greater hip joint angles throughout the entire phase (cluster-level p < 0.001, corrected p = 0.000193); no significant differences were found in joint moments or vertical GRF after correction. SI_norm further demonstrated that, even when peak metrics showed no significant inter-limb differences, phase-specific threshold exceedances were common within individual continuous waveforms; at the ±10% threshold, 100% of participants exhibited threshold exceedances for both the hip joint moment and vertical GRF. However, no significant differences were observed between the durations of threshold exceedance in the dominant and non-dominant directions for any variable. Conclusion Lower-limb asymmetry during single-leg lateral jump landing is time-dependent and joint-specific rather than fully captured by peak values. Discrete peak analysis may miss phase-specific differences, and limb dominance does not consistently indicate greater mechanical loading. Combining discrete peaks, SPM1D, and SI_norm provides complementary group- and individual-level descriptions of asymmetry. SI_norm exceedances should not be interpreted directly as absolute load asymmetry or functional abnormality; the utility of these measures for injury-risk screening requires further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: