Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Accurate photometric-redshift estimation and calibration of the weak-lensing point-spread function (PSF) for Euclid require complementary ground-based optical imaging with high photometric precision and spatial homogeneity. The Organisation Unit for External Data (OU-EXT) integrates heterogeneous ground-based surveys into the Euclid Science Ground Segment (SGS), delivering uniformly calibrated, co-added images, and associated PSF models. To minimise systematics in spectral energy distribution (SED) reconstruction and photometric-redshift estimation, these data must achieve relative photometric stability at the ~10 mmag level on Euclid-tile scales. We present the ground-based imaging component of Euclid Data Release 1 (DR1), comprising ~2500 deg² across the wide, deep, and auxiliary fields. We summarise the OU-EXT production workflow and validation framework, and quantify the achieved data quality of the co-added products in terms of depth, photometric zero-point stability, and spatial colour homogeneity. In the Euclid Wide Survey (EWS), the point-source $10σ$ depths in the $griz$ bands reach 24.8/24.3/24.0/23.0 AB mag, with the deep fields extending 1--2 magnitudes deeper. Most EWS DR1 tiles meet the 10 mmag relative photometric requirement, with 1.1% and 1.5% showing offsets exceeding 50 mmag in the northern and southern hemispheres, respectively. Spatial colour variations remain typically below 5--10 mmag across the southern EWS footprint, while larger residual structures of 10--25 mmag appear in some northern regions. These results demonstrate that the EXT production chain provides a largely homogeneous framework for integrating ground-based datasets into Euclid, while identifying calibration and co-addition limitations that have to be addressed in DR2 to meet the mission's most stringent cosmological requirements. (Abridged)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Collaboration et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: