Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Injection molding (IM) quality optimization involves coupled process variables, nonlinear quality responses, and a limited budget for physical trials. Numerical optimizers can use measured process data effectively, but they do not directly represent troubleshooting rules and other experience-based knowledge that is recorded in text. This study proposes large language model-based extended data-driven optimization (LLM-EDO), a domain-knowledge-guided framework for surrogate-based candidate generation. The framework converts process variables, quality curve discrepancies, feasible bounds, and retrieved expert cases into a structured request. A language model then proposes a bounded parameter vector, and a fixed long short-term memory surrogate evaluates the resulting quality curve. The framework is examined in a surrogate-in-the-loop environment using repeated and multi-start tests and is compared with Bayesian optimization, simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation, and knowledge-informed gradient-based SPSA. The reported runs show reductions in curve distance for the tested initial configurations and competitive terminal objective values. They also show run-to-run variability, and iteration counts are reported as decision rounds rather than wall-clock measurements. The results support the feasibility of domain-knowledge-guided candidate generation for surrogate-based quality curve matching under the tested process configurations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xie et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: