Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensors are widely used for temperature monitoring because of their compact size, wavelength-encoded response, corrosion resistance, multiplexing capability, and immunity to electromagnetic interference. However, the accuracy of physics-based FBG models depends strongly on the thermal and optical parameters adopted in the simulation. This study developed a MATLAB-based physics-driven framework for calibrating the temperature response of a uniform silica FBG using particle swarm optimization (PSO). The model was formulated from the Bragg condition and incorporated temperature-dependent variations in effective refractive index and grating period through the thermo-optic and thermal-expansion coefficients. A published 17-point temperature–wavelength dataset spanning approximately 9.49–90.34 °C was digitized for model calibration and comparison. The extracted experimental sensitivity was 9.9450 pm/°C, compared with 10.13 pm/°C reported in the source study. The baseline model predicted a sensitivity of 14.1799 pm/°C, with RMSE, MAE, MAPE, and R² values of 0.20353 nm, 0.17446 nm, 43.90%, and 0.3151, respectively. Following PSO calibration, the predicted sensitivity decreased to 9.8888 pm/°C, differing by only 0.57% from the extracted experimental value. The calibrated model achieved an RMSE of 0.00521 nm, MAE of 0.00405 nm, MAPE of 1.38%, and R² of 0.99955. These results demonstrate that bounded PSO calibration can substantially improve agreement between a transparent physics-based FBG model and experimental data. Because the same dataset was used for parameter estimation and performance assessment, the results represent in-sample calibration performance rather than independent predictive validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abubakar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: