Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Endometriosis affects approximately 10% of women globally, with diagnostic delays often exceeding 8 years. Urocortin-1 (UCN-1) and alpha-enolase (ENO1) have each been independently implicated in its pathobiology, but their co-regulatory relationship in circulation remains poorly understood. This study aimed to quantify serum UCN-1, ENO1, and MMP-9 in patients versus controls, characterise the ENO1–UCN-1 correlation, and evaluate the independent diagnostic contribution of these biomarkers. Results Principal biomarkers were significantly elevated in patients (MMP-9: p = 0.015; ENO1: p = 0.040; UCN-1: p = 0.021). A pivotal finding was the very strong positive correlation between serum ENO1 and UCN-1 ( r = 0.91, 95% CI 0.853–0.945; p < 0.001), suggesting strong co-regulation. Both markers exhibited significant stage-dependent escalation ( p < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression adjusted for age and BMI, UCN-1 emerged as a strong independent predictor (aOR = 4.564; 95% CI: 1.083–19.227; p = 0.039), while ENO1 was not independently predictive (aOR = 0.868; p = 0.451) due to high collinearity with UCN-1 (VIF = 5.82). The combined panel (UCN-1 + ENO1 + MMP-9) achieved AUC = 0.717 (bootstrap-corrected 0.701; 95% CI 0.611–0.789). Conclusions The r = 0.91 correlation provides preliminary serum-level evidence consistent with a hypothesised stress–metabolism axis, in which UCN-1-mediated signalling may be associated with glycolytic reprogramming (ENO1), putatively via PI3K–Akt and HIF-1α, although the intracellular steps were not measured in this study and the cascade remains hypothesis-generating only. ENO1 is not an independent biomarker of endometriosis in this dataset; its apparent contribution is fully captured by UCN-1 due to strong co-regulation. The combined UCN-1/ENO1/MMP-9 panel is NOT ready for clinical use: the AUC of 0.717 falls well below clinically deployable thresholds (typically AUC ≥ 0.85–0.90), and prospective external validation in larger, multi-centre cohorts — together with direct mechanistic confirmation — is mandatory before any clinical adoption can be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jabbar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: