Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study aimed to (1) develop an evaluation model for Active Learning management for primary school teachers using empowerment evaluation, (2) implement the developed evaluation model, and (3) evaluate the quality of the model. The sample included 250 school administrators and teachers under the Surin Primary Educational Service Area Office 1, nine experts, five teachers participating in a focus group discussion, and 18 teachers from small, medium, and large schools. The research instruments consisted of an appropriateness assessment form, a knowledge test, an attitude scale, a satisfaction questionnaire, and structured interview forms. Quantitative data were analyzed using percentage, mean, and standard deviation, while qualitative data were analyzed through content analysis. The findings revealed that (1) the developed evaluation model consisted of four components: a pre-development study, teacher development planning, implementation, and evaluation; (2) after implementation, teachers demonstrated high levels of knowledge, understanding, attitudes, and ability in evaluating Active Learning; and (3) the overall evaluation indicated that the model was useful, feasible, accurate, and appropriate, with teachers reporting a high level of satisfaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chatrawithanaphat et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: