Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Integrating smoking cessation care with cancer management is a pillar of high-quality care. However, implementation remains variable and little is known about how smoking cessation models are effectively operationalized in oncology settings. OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics, adaptations, and operationalization of evidence-based smoking cessation models in oncology settings, and identify approaches to the definition, measurement, and evaluation of implementation outcomes. METHODS: This systematic review followed JBI methodology. Five databases were searched to identify reports published between January 2010 and August 2025. Included reports described the implementation of evidence-based smoking cessation care models or process enhancements in hospitals or cancer services delivering care to people with cancer. Data sources were treated as complementary, synthesized separately, and integrated as a narrative summary. RESULTS: Thirty-eight reports were included, identifying 33 implementation strategies and 38 models of care. Models of care included 3As (n = 18), 5As (n = 11), and 4As (n = 1) brief interventions, and specialist care models (n = 8). Nurses were commonly delegated to initiate smoking conversations (10/38) and facilitate referrals (17/38). Implementation strategies varied, however, education and training programs, and technology enhancements were commonly reported. Adaptation was a prominent feature and identified across most implementation strategies (24/33). Reporting and measurement of implementation outcomes was limited and not always aligned to a defined framework. CONCLUSIONS: Brief 3A models, nurse involvement, and opt-out referral pathways are core characteristics of smoking cessation care in oncology settings. Adaptation and tailoring components appear as a common feature of implementation strategies. Further reporting and evaluation of implementation outcomes is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McEnallay et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: