Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Selecting maize hybrids for a given planting density requires knowing whether their yield responses to nutrition programmes persist across seasons. A two-season factorial randomized complete block experiment in Karacabey, Türkiye, compared ten commercial hybrids at three target densities under mineral fertilization (NPK) or a plant growth-promoting bacterial consortium (PGPB) without mineral fertilizer. Grain yield was standardized to 15% moisture. Across seasons, NPK and PGPB averaged 1578.73 and 1554.70 kg da−1, respectively. The PGPB-NPK difference was −24.02 kg da−1 (heteroscedasticity-robust 95% confidence interval: −40.95 to −7.10). The PGPB-NPK difference for P2105 at 9500 plants da−1 was positive in both seasons but was not significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons. The results identify hybrid-density combinations for further testing and do not establish yield equivalence or support replacing mineral fertilizer. P2105 at 9500 plants da−1 is a candidate for independent validation under comparable conditions. These findings show that recommendations for the bacterial nutrition programme should account for maize hybrid, target planting density and growing season.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pakize Ozlem Kurt (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: