Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-modal alignment is the standard objective for building multimodal representations. We show that alignment as a sole objective is lossy wherever modalities are informationally asymmetric---where neither can express what the other carries. Visual question answering is an obvious case: a question is a selective relational operator probing a dense visual field whose fine-grained features no query recovers, so what alignment preserves is not what the task requires. We prove an Alignment Redundancy Bound: alignment-only Dirichlet energy minimization retains at most the redundant information atom (Z; X₁, X₂), annihilating private modality-specific structure (Z; Xₘ) and cross-modal synergy (Z; X₁, X₂). We introduce Decomposed JEPA (D-JEPA), which factorizes latents into an aligned shared core and private modality-specific fibers. The shared core retains most of the structure alignment targets; the private fibers recover what alignment discards, via contextual masked prediction and asymmetric cross-subspace independence. Under information asymmetry, alignment-only training undergoes catastrophic semantic collapse on compositional reasoning benchmarks, surviving only on binary queries. D-JEPA averts this collapse, substantially improving downstream accuracy over both alignment-only and alignment-with-reconstruction baselines, and restoring a positive multimodal synergy gap in place of the baseline's inverted gap. Information-theoretic audits confirm that D-JEPA recovers most of the mutual information available from a frozen backbone, and causal fiber-swap interventions demonstrate that the recovered information is causally localized in the private fibers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yusuf Shihata (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: