Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Acute respiratory infections (ARI) impose a large global burden and show marked seasonality that implicates environmental drivers, yet the lagged effects of these exposures on pathogen-specific positivity remain poorly characterised. Using case-level data from seven sentinel hospitals in Sichuan, China (2024–2026) aggregated to a weekly panel of 23 014 ARI cases, we applied quasi-Poisson distributed-lag non-linear models (cross-basis, 6-week lag; trend spline; city effects; log offset) to estimate cumulative relative risks (90th versus 10th percentile) for temperature, relative humidity and six air pollutants, with within-pathogen false-discovery-rate control. At least one pathogen was detected in 51.9% of cases and co-detection in 18.2%; Haemophilus influenzae and influenza predominated. Relative humidity gave the most stable single-exposure association with respiratory syncytial virus positivity ( RR 2.01, 95% CI 1.06–3.82); it failed FDR control (adjusted P = 0.130 ) and was nullified by temperature co-adjustment ( RR 1.05). H. influenzae rose with temperature and ozone and fell with PM2.5; SARS-CoV-2 tracked carbon monoxide. Twelve of 40 estimates survived FDR control. The humidity–RSV signal is robust to model specification yet fragile under co-varying exposures — the cautionary lesson — and the reusable output is a transparent screening framework that exposes such fragility, serving exposure science and environmental epidemiology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: