Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Early identification of SLE patients with causative genetic variants may inform precision treatment strategies by revealing actionable biological pathways. In a refractory SLE patient harboring a somatic TNFAIP3 variant, we sought additional pathogenic variants and disease mechanisms. The patient’s medical records were collected. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to detect pathogenic variants and the variant allele frequency. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and C1q reconstitution assay were conducted to assess the complement components. Bulk RNA sequencing and quantitative PCR were performed to explore the activation of inflammatory pathways. A 4-year-old girl with recurrent fever, arthritis, chilblain-like rashes, recurrent seizures, multiple positive autoantibodies and intracranial calcifications was referred to our hospital. Initial WES found a somatic pathogenic TNFAIP3 variant, suggesting the diagnosis of haploinsufficiency of A20 (HA20), which could account for the recurrent fever. However, the patient did not respond well to the first-line TNF inhibitors for HA20, prompting further genetic analysis. And a novel homozygous variant in C1QB was found. Complement assays showed functional C1q deficiency despite normal C1q levels. RNA sequencing revealed strong type I interferon signature in the patient, which was suppressed following treatment with the tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor deucravacitinib. Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) infusions restored complement hemolytic activity. Combination therapy with FFP and deucravacitinib was associated with clinical stabilization and successful steroid tapering. We report a SLE case due to a novel C1QB variant causing functional C1q deficiency without reducing protein levels, with targeted C1q therapy showing efficacy. The co-existing somatic TNFAIP3 variant might contribute to part of the phenotype, such as recurrent fever.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: